|
|
|
The Difference Between Heartworm Treatments
Brilliant question.
Here are the actual facts on heartworm treatments.
Conclusions:
Slow kill is a long process which leaves the door open to embolism and heart damage. But it’s unarguably safer.
Fast kill closes the door on long term issues by ‘wrapping up’ the infection in weeks instead of years, but on the very short term, doubles the chance for problem of consequence.
My decision would be based on the value of the dog sentimentally or economically, the age of the pet, and the pet’s realistic activity level and “years-left-to-live.”
My dog Ajax is 3 years old (2019) and I love him so, so much. If he contracted heart worms I would perform an echocardiogram and find out if it was a heavy burden. If his heart was compromised in any way I would give him Fast Kill via Immiticide.
If the case were a rescue, and costs are always a factor, I would let Slow Kill do the job. That would be predicated on whether I trusted the foster to give the preventative without fail.
Doc Johnson
|
||
|
There are so many incorrect things that "they" say like they're facts, on the interwebs, like "Don't Use People Shampoo" and "Don't Give Your Dog Actual Bones" and "Raw Feeding is Bad For Your Dog" and even "Cats Need Water In Their Food". Is there any harm in these? No, not really but here's the truth. |
|
||
This site may generate a small commission from Amazon if you order something from one of my links. It does not affect what you pay. I'm appreciative of the support because it's how I keep this site 'up' instead of bankrolling the resource. I may consider ad revenue in the future. |
|
|
|
No element in this site is intended to diagnose or treat any condition with any pet whether a VCPR patient with Johnson Veterinary Services, or otherwise. Site neither assumes nor accepts any responsibility for direct or indirect consequential damage to owner, patient or other livestock via the use of information in this site. You've been warned.
|